Cello C85ANSMT-4K VS LG OLED65B7V

This head to head article puts head to head the Cello C85ANSMT-4K and the LG OLED65B7V TVsShould you opt for the Cello C85ANSMT-4K or is it smarter to choose the LG OLED65B7V? Lets compare their Connectivity, Ergonomics, Efficiency and Picture Quality.

Connectivity
Ethernet Support
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

Supported
normal
Better than 10% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
47%

Smart TV
Yes
ok
Better than 12% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
50%

Yes
normal
Better than 12% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
50%

USB Ports
2?
somewhat below average
Better than 26% of the TVs, 36% are better than it.
45%

3?
top notch
Better than 64% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
93%

WiFi Support
Yes
above average
Better than 21% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
62%

Yes
more than average
Better than 21% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
62%

Our conclusion is that the When it comes to Connectivity, Cello C85ANSMT-4K is marginally worse in comarison with LG OLED65B7V.
Ergonomics
Screen Size
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

164cm
quite brilliant
Better than 86% of the TVs, 9% are better than it.
90%

Thinness
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

282mm
subpar
Better than 9% of the TVs, 90% are better than it.
9%

Lightness
56kg
beyond average
Better than 65% of the TVs, 35% are better than it.
65%

24.5kg
more than average
Better than 72% of the TVs, 28% are better than it.
72%

Bottom line, the Ergonomics of Cello C85ANSMT-4K is better in comparison with that of LG OLED65B7V.
Efficiency
Power Consumption
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

214kWh/year
subpar
Better than 7% of the TVs, 93% are better than it.
7%

Efficiency Classification
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

A
bad
Better than 9% of the TVs, 45% are better than it.
23%

The When it comes to Efficiency, Cello C85ANSMT-4K is undoubtedly superior when compared with LG OLED65B7V.
Picture Quality
Brightness
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

750cd/m²
top end
Better than 91% of the TVs, 7% are better than it.
92%

HDR Support
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

Yes
wonderful
Better than 54% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
88%

Display Type
LCD
ok
Better than 21% of the TVs, 9% are better than it.
57%

OLED (AMOLED)
immensely fabulous
Better than 91% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
99%

Resolution
3840×2160 (4K Ultra HD)
very solid
Better than 53% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
87%

3840×2160 (4K Ultra HD)
remarkable
Better than 53% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
87%

Refresh Frequency
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

120Hz
fabulous
Better than 79% of the TVs, 10% are better than it.
88%

Our analysis shows that the Picture Quality of Cello C85ANSMT-4K is slightly worse in comparison with that of LG OLED65B7V.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *