Cubot Note Plus VS Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F

This head to head article puts head to head the Cubot Note Plus and the Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F PhonesShould you choose the Cubot Note Plus or would it be better if you choose the Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F? Lets compare the two Phones by comparing their Camera, Screen Quality, Performance, Battery Life, Features and Ergonomics.

Camera
Cameras Count
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

2?
ok
Better than 16% of the Phones, 14% are better than it.
48%

To sum it up, the Cubot Note Plus has a slightly superior Camera in comparison with Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F.
Screen Quality
Pixel Density
424PPI
beyond average
Better than 70% of the Phones, 24% are better than it.
74%

294PPI
slightly below average
Better than 34% of the Phones, 56% are better than it.
39%

Screen Resolution
1080x1920pixels
normal
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

720x1280pixels
average
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Display Type
LCD
ok
Better than 21% of the Phones, 9% are better than it.
57%

OLED (AMOLED)
pretty awesome
Better than 91% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
99%

Our analysis shows that the When it comes to Screen Quality, Cubot Note Plus is marginally superior in comarison with Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F.
Performance
Processor Cores Count
Quad Core
average
Better than 31% of the Phones, 28% are better than it.
54%

Quad Core
normal
Better than 31% of the Phones, 28% are better than it.
54%

SoC
MediaTek MT6737T
good
Better than 62% of the Phones, 34% are better than it.
65%

Spreadtrum SC8830
somewhat horrible
Better than 1% of the Phones, 96% are better than it.
1%

RAM Size
3072MB
good
Better than 60% of the Phones, 22% are better than it.
73%

1536MB
poor
Better than 37% of the Phones, 60% are better than it.
38%

Processor Frequency
1.5GHz
average
Better than 52% of the Phones, 40% are better than it.
57%

1.5GHz
average
Better than 52% of the Phones, 40% are better than it.
57%

Our analysis shows that the Performance of Cubot Note Plus is notably better in comparison with that of Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F.
Battery Life
Fast Charging Support
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

No
average
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Talk Time
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

22h
good
Better than 81% of the Phones, 16% are better than it.
83%

Battery Capacity
2800mAh
normal
Better than 53% of the Phones, 45% are better than it.
54%

2600mAh
normal
Better than 47% of the Phones, 50% are better than it.
48%

The When it comes to Battery Life, Cubot Note Plus is similar in comparison to Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F.
Features
Wireless Charging
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

No
unpleasant
Better than 0% of the Phones, 15% are better than it.
34%

NFC Support
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Supports NFC
extremely solid
Better than 48% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
85%

To sum it up, the Features of Cubot Note Plus is slightly lesser in comparison with that of Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F.
Ergonomics
Thinness
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

7.9mm
remarkable
Better than 87% of the Phones, 13% are better than it.
86%

Scratch Resistance
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

No
relatively terrible
Better than 0% of the Phones, 74% are better than it.
5%

Water Resistance
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

No
somewhat terrible
Better than 0% of the Phones, 30% are better than it.
25%

Bottom line, the Ergonomics of Cubot Note Plus is superior in comparison with that of Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *