House of Marley Smile Jamaica In-Ear Apple VS Skullcandy Smokin Buds 2.0

In this head to head article we take a look at the House of Marley Smile Jamaica In-Ear Apple and the Skullcandy Smokin Buds 2.0 Headphones. We compare the features and specifications of the House of Marley Smile Jamaica In-Ear Apple and Skullcandy Smokin Buds 2.0.

Portability
Lightness
75g
more than average
Better than 63% of the Headphones, 37% are better than it.
63%

28g
good
Better than 70% of the Headphones, 30% are better than it.
70%

Lightness
75g
beyond average
Better than 63% of the Headphones, 37% are better than it.
63%

28g
good
Better than 70% of the Headphones, 30% are better than it.
70%

Lightness
75g
good
Better than 63% of the Headphones, 37% are better than it.
63%

28g
beyond average
Better than 70% of the Headphones, 30% are better than it.
70%

Our conclusion is that the House of Marley Smile Jamaica In-Ear Apple has a superior Portability compared to Skullcandy Smokin Buds 2.0.
Sound Quality
Driver Diameter
8mm
somewhat terrible
Better than 5% of the Headphones, 93% are better than it.
5%

9.2mm
subpar
Better than 18% of the Headphones, 82% are better than it.
17%

Sensitivity
98dB/mW
unpleasant
Better than 19% of the Headphones, 76% are better than it.
20%

–
Better than 30% of the Headphones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Sensitivity
98dB/mW
relatively horrible
Better than 19% of the Headphones, 76% are better than it.
20%

–
Better than 30% of the Headphones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Driver Diameter
8mm
subpar
Better than 5% of the Headphones, 93% are better than it.
5%

9.2mm
bad
Better than 18% of the Headphones, 82% are better than it.
17%

Max Frequency
20000Hz
unpleasant
Better than 12% of the Headphones, 29% are better than it.
34%

20000Hz
unpleasant
Better than 12% of the Headphones, 29% are better than it.
34%

To sum it up, the In terms of Sound Quality, House of Marley Smile Jamaica In-Ear Apple is worse when compared with Skullcandy Smokin Buds 2.0.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Comments