Huawei Y3 VS Geemarc CL8500

The following head to head review compares between the Huawei Y3 and the Geemarc CL8500 PhonesWe compare the features and specifications of the two Phones, comparing their Performance, Camera, Ergonomics, Battery Life, Features and Screen Quality.

Performance
Processor Frequency
1.2GHz
relatively horrible
Better than 17% of the Phones, 83% are better than it.
16%

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Processor Cores Count
Quad Core
normal
Better than 31% of the Phones, 28% are better than it.
54%

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

SoC
MediaTek MT6582M
subpar
Better than 14% of the Phones, 83% are better than it.
14%

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

RAM Size
512MB
somewhat horrible
Better than 8% of the Phones, 82% are better than it.
9%

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Our conclusion is that the When we look at the Performance, Huawei Y3 is substantially poorer compared to Geemarc CL8500.
Camera
Cameras Count
2?
ok
Better than 16% of the Phones, 14% are better than it.
48%

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Our review shows that the When it comes to Camera, Huawei Y3 is marginally worse in comarison with Geemarc CL8500.
Ergonomics
Scratch Resistance
No
subpar
Better than 0% of the Phones, 74% are better than it.
5%

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Water Resistance
No
poor
Better than 0% of the Phones, 30% are better than it.
25%

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Thinness
10.9mm
average
Better than 54% of the Phones, 46% are better than it.
54%

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

The In terms of Ergonomics, Huawei Y3 is worse when compared with Geemarc CL8500.
Battery Life
Fast Charging Support
No
normal
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

No
average
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Battery Capacity
2000mAh
relatively below par
Better than 29% of the Phones, 66% are better than it.
31%

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Our conclusion is that the When it comes to Battery Life, Huawei Y3 is substantially poorer compared with Geemarc CL8500.
Features
Wireless Charging
No
below average
Better than 0% of the Phones, 15% are better than it.
34%

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

NFC Support
No
somewhat terrible
Better than 0% of the Phones, 52% are better than it.
14%

No
somewhat terrible
Better than 0% of the Phones, 52% are better than it.
14%

The Features of Huawei Y3 is similar in comparison with that of Geemarc CL8500.
Screen Quality
Screen Resolution
480x854pixels
ok
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Display Type
LCD
normal
Better than 21% of the Phones, 9% are better than it.
57%

LCD
ok
Better than 21% of the Phones, 9% are better than it.
57%

Pixel Density
245PPI
somewhat terrible
Better than 19% of the Phones, 78% are better than it.
19%

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Our analysis shows that the Screen Quality of Huawei Y3 is lesser in comparison with that of Geemarc CL8500.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *