Intel Core 6500 3.2GHz VS Intel Core i7 4820K 3.7GHz without Cooler

This head to head article puts head to head the Intel Core 6500 3.2GHz and the Intel Core i7 4820K 3.7GHz without Cooler CPUsFor that we review the specifications of the Intel Core 6500 3.2GHz and Intel Core i7 4820K 3.7GHz without Cooler.

Single Thread Performance
L3 Size
6MB
acceptable
Better than 31% of the CPUs, 50% are better than it.
40%

10MB
good
Better than 71% of the CPUs, 25% are better than it.
74%

Clock Speed
3.2GHz
normal
Better than 50% of the CPUs, 50% are better than it.
50%

3.7GHz
magnificent
Better than 89% of the CPUs, 11% are better than it.
88%

L3 Size
6MB
acceptable
Better than 31% of the CPUs, 50% are better than it.
40%

10MB
good
Better than 71% of the CPUs, 25% are better than it.
74%

Max Clock Speed
3.6GHz
acceptable
Better than 46% of the CPUs, 54% are better than it.
45%

3.9GHz
good
Better than 66% of the CPUs, 34% are better than it.
65%

L3 Size
6MB
somewhat below average
Better than 31% of the CPUs, 50% are better than it.
40%

10MB
above average
Better than 71% of the CPUs, 25% are better than it.
74%

Our review shows that the Single Thread Performance of Intel Core 6500 3.2GHz is inferior compared to that of Intel Core i7 4820K 3.7GHz without Cooler.
Connectivity
PCI Express Lanes
16
ok
Better than 30% of the CPUs, 20% are better than it.
58%

40
average
Better than 30% of the CPUs, 20% are better than it.
58%

The When it comes to Connectivity, Intel Core 6500 3.2GHz is similar in comarison with Intel Core i7 4820K 3.7GHz without Cooler.
Power Efficiency
Process technology
14nm
top end
Better than 99% of the CPUs, 1% are better than it.
99%

22nm
good
Better than 63% of the CPUs, 37% are better than it.
63%

Process technology
14nm
quite wonderful
Better than 99% of the CPUs, 1% are better than it.
99%

22nm
beyond average
Better than 63% of the CPUs, 37% are better than it.
63%

The Power Efficiency of Intel Core 6500 3.2GHz is unquestionably better in comparison with that of Intel Core i7 4820K 3.7GHz without Cooler.
Multi Thread Performance
Threads Count
4?
unpleasant
Better than 12% of the CPUs, 52% are better than it.
24%

8?
above average
Better than 49% of the CPUs, 29% are better than it.
64%

Cores Count
4?
normal
Better than 25% of the CPUs, 29% are better than it.
48%

4?
average
Better than 25% of the CPUs, 29% are better than it.
48%

Threads Count
4?
relatively terrible
Better than 12% of the CPUs, 52% are better than it.
24%

8?
good
Better than 49% of the CPUs, 29% are better than it.
64%

Bottom line, the Multi Thread Performance of Intel Core 6500 3.2GHz is poorer compared to that of Intel Core i7 4820K 3.7GHz without Cooler.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *