JCB Sitemaster 3G VS Microsoft Lumia 640

The following head to head review compares between the JCB Sitemaster 3G and the Microsoft Lumia 640 PhonesShould you buy the JCB Sitemaster 3G or is it smarter to consider the Microsoft Lumia 640? Lets compare their Features, Ergonomics, Camera, Screen Quality, Performance and Battery Life.

Features
Wireless Charging
No
below average
Better than 0% of the Phones, 15% are better than it.
34%

No
poor
Better than 0% of the Phones, 15% are better than it.
34%

NFC Support
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Supports NFC
lovely
Better than 48% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
85%

Bottom line, the Features of JCB Sitemaster 3G is marginally poorer in comparison with that of Microsoft Lumia 640.
Ergonomics
Scratch Resistance
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Yes
beyond average
Better than 26% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
68%

Water Resistance
Yes
pretty impressive
Better than 70% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
95%

No
poor
Better than 0% of the Phones, 30% are better than it.
25%

Thinness
23mm
poor
Better than 37% of the Phones, 63% are better than it.
36%

8.8mm
above average
Better than 71% of the Phones, 29% are better than it.
71%

Our conclusion is that the Ergonomics of JCB Sitemaster 3G is marginally worse in comparison with that of Microsoft Lumia 640.
Camera
Sensor Size
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

1/4″
relatively terrible
Better than 3% of the Phones, 97% are better than it.
3%

Cameras Count
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

2?
ok
Better than 16% of the Phones, 14% are better than it.
48%

The Camera of JCB Sitemaster 3G is substantially better compared to that of Microsoft Lumia 640.
Screen Quality
Display Type
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

LCD
ok
Better than 21% of the Phones, 9% are better than it.
57%

Screen Resolution
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

720x1280pixels
average
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Pixel Density
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

294PPI
a bit below average
Better than 34% of the Phones, 56% are better than it.
39%

To sum it up, the When we look at the Screen Quality, JCB Sitemaster 3G is slightly better in comparison to Microsoft Lumia 640.
Performance
Processor Frequency
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

1.2GHz
relatively terrible
Better than 17% of the Phones, 83% are better than it.
16%

RAM Size
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

1024MB
bad
Better than 19% of the Phones, 63% are better than it.
25%

Processor Cores Count
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Quad Core
normal
Better than 31% of the Phones, 28% are better than it.
54%

SoC
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926
a bit below average
Better than 41% of the Phones, 55% are better than it.
43%

The Performance of JCB Sitemaster 3G is superior in comparison with that of Microsoft Lumia 640.
Battery Life
Talk Time
5h
relatively horrible
Better than 5% of the Phones, 92% are better than it.
5%

20.3h
pleasant
Better than 76% of the Phones, 24% are better than it.
76%

Fast Charging Support
No
normal
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

No
average
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Battery Capacity
1300mAh
unpleasant
Better than 13% of the Phones, 85% are better than it.
13%

2500mAh
a bit below average
Better than 43% of the Phones, 54% are better than it.
44%

Stand by Time
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

864h
top notch
Better than 96% of the Phones, 4% are better than it.
96%

Bottom line, the Battery Life of JCB Sitemaster 3G is inferior in comparison with that of Microsoft Lumia 640.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *