JCB Sitemaster 3G VS Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F

The following head to head review compares between the JCB Sitemaster 3G and the Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F PhonesShould you consider the JCB Sitemaster 3G or is it smarter to consider the Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F? Lets compare their Camera, Features, Screen Quality, Battery Life, Ergonomics and Performance.

Camera
Cameras Count
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

2?
average
Better than 16% of the Phones, 14% are better than it.
48%

Our conclusion is that the When we look at the Camera, JCB Sitemaster 3G is marginally better in comarison with Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F.
Features
Wireless Charging
No
relatively unpleasant
Better than 0% of the Phones, 15% are better than it.
34%

No
unpleasant
Better than 0% of the Phones, 15% are better than it.
34%

NFC Support
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Supports NFC
wonderful
Better than 48% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
85%

Our conclusion is that the Features of JCB Sitemaster 3G is marginally lesser in comparison with that of Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F.
Screen Quality
Pixel Density
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

294PPI
somewhat below average
Better than 34% of the Phones, 56% are better than it.
39%

Display Type
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

OLED (AMOLED)
superb
Better than 91% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
99%

Screen Resolution
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

720x1280pixels
normal
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

The JCB Sitemaster 3G has a marginally superior Screen Quality in comparison with Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F.
Battery Life
Talk Time
5h
bad
Better than 5% of the Phones, 92% are better than it.
5%

22h
pleasant
Better than 81% of the Phones, 16% are better than it.
83%

Fast Charging Support
No
ok
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

No
average
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Battery Capacity
1300mAh
poor
Better than 13% of the Phones, 85% are better than it.
13%

2600mAh
average
Better than 47% of the Phones, 50% are better than it.
48%

The When it comes to Battery Life, JCB Sitemaster 3G is poorer when compared with Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F.
Ergonomics
Thinness
23mm
relatively poor
Better than 37% of the Phones, 63% are better than it.
36%

7.9mm
lovely
Better than 87% of the Phones, 13% are better than it.
86%

Scratch Resistance
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

No
somewhat horrible
Better than 0% of the Phones, 74% are better than it.
5%

Water Resistance
Yes
best in class
Better than 70% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
95%

No
relatively terrible
Better than 0% of the Phones, 30% are better than it.
25%

Our comparison shows that the When we look at the Ergonomics, JCB Sitemaster 3G is marginally better compared to Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F.
Performance
SoC
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Spreadtrum SC8830
relatively horrible
Better than 1% of the Phones, 96% are better than it.
1%

Processor Frequency
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

1.5GHz
ok
Better than 52% of the Phones, 40% are better than it.
57%

Processor Cores Count
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Quad Core
normal
Better than 31% of the Phones, 28% are better than it.
54%

RAM Size
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

1536MB
below average
Better than 37% of the Phones, 60% are better than it.
38%

To sum it up, the When it comes to Performance, JCB Sitemaster 3G is substantially better in comarison with Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *