LG 65UK6400PLF VS Samsung QE55Q6F

In the following head to head comparison two similarly priced TVs are put head to head, the LG 65UK6400PLF and the Samsung QE55Q6F. Should you consider the LG 65UK6400PLF or would it be better if you opt for the Samsung QE55Q6F? Lets compare the two TVs in terms of Picture Quality, Connectivity, Efficiency and Ergonomics.

Picture Quality
HDR Support
Yes
fabulous
Better than 54% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
88%

Yes
remarkable
Better than 54% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
88%

Display Type
LCD
normal
Better than 21% of the TVs, 9% are better than it.
57%

LCD
normal
Better than 21% of the TVs, 9% are better than it.
57%

HDR Support
Yes
wonderful
Better than 54% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
88%

Yes
lovely
Better than 54% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
88%

LED Placing
Edge lit LED
unpleasant
Better than 0% of the TVs, 61% are better than it.
10%

Edge lit LED
relatively horrible
Better than 0% of the TVs, 61% are better than it.
10%

Display Type
LCD
ok
Better than 21% of the TVs, 9% are better than it.
57%

LCD
average
Better than 21% of the TVs, 9% are better than it.
57%

Resolution
3840×2160 (4K Ultra HD)
wonderful
Better than 53% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
87%

3840×2160 (4K Ultra HD)
remarkable
Better than 53% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
87%

Our conclusion is that the Picture Quality of LG 65UK6400PLF is similar in comparison with that of Samsung QE55Q6F.
Connectivity
WiFi Support
Yes
more than average
Better than 21% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
62%

Yes
good
Better than 21% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
62%

Smart TV
Yes
ok
Better than 12% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
50%

Yes
normal
Better than 12% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
50%

Smart TV
Yes
normal
Better than 12% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
50%

Yes
ok
Better than 12% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
50%

USB Ports
2?
somewhat below average
Better than 26% of the TVs, 36% are better than it.
45%

3?
excellent
Better than 64% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
93%

To sum it up, the Connectivity of LG 65UK6400PLF is marginally worse compared to that of Samsung QE55Q6F.
Efficiency
Power Consumption
204kWh/year
unpleasant
Better than 9% of the TVs, 90% are better than it.
9%

154kWh/year
subpar
Better than 22% of the TVs, 77% are better than it.
22%

Efficiency Classification
A
somewhat horrible
Better than 9% of the TVs, 45% are better than it.
23%

A
subpar
Better than 9% of the TVs, 45% are better than it.
23%

Our comparison shows that the LG 65UK6400PLF has a marginally worse Efficiency compared to Samsung QE55Q6F.
Ergonomics
Lightness
22.1kg
good
Better than 73% of the TVs, 27% are better than it.
73%

17.9kg
good
Better than 77% of the TVs, 23% are better than it.
76%

Lightness
22.1kg
good
Better than 73% of the TVs, 27% are better than it.
73%

17.9kg
good
Better than 77% of the TVs, 23% are better than it.
76%

Thinness
311mm
poor
Better than 6% of the TVs, 94% are better than it.
6%

209.9mm
poor
Better than 24% of the TVs, 76% are better than it.
24%

Our analysis shows that the LG 65UK6400PLF has a marginally inferior Ergonomics compared to Samsung QE55Q6F.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *