LG K4 Dual K130E Review

In this review we talk about LG K4 Dual K130E features and specifications. We will help you decide whether you should consider the LG K4 Dual K130E as your next Phone or not. To that end we review its Camera, Screen Quality, Performance, Battery Life, Ergonomics and Features.

There are a few other competing Phones that you highly advised to check like Nokia 230 Dual SIM, Geemarc CL8500, Doro PhoneEasy 632, Doro PhoneEasy 410gsm, Panasonic KX-TU150 and Doro 2424.

Camera

In the following we discuss the Camera of LG K4 Dual K130E.

Better than 16% of the Phones, 14% are better than it.
Cameras Count
average
2
56%
Better than 29% of the Phones, 71% are better than it.
Video Max Resolution
relatively below average
1280×720 (HD 720) pixels
28%
The bottom line is that LG K4 Dual K130E’s Camera is more than average.
Screen Quality

In the following we take a look at the Screen Quality of LG K4 Dual K130E.

Better than 21% of the Phones, 9% are better than it.
Display Type
good
LCD
65%
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
Screen Resolution
beyond average
480×854 pixels
64%
Better than 10% of the Phones, 89% are better than it.
Pixel Density
poor
217 PPI
10%
Over all, LG K4 Dual K130E’s Screen Quality is good.
Performance

In this section we take a look at LG K4 Dual K130E’s Performance.

Better than 5% of the Phones, 87% are better than it.
Processor Frequency
unpleasant
1 GHz
6%
Better than 28% of the Phones, 67% are better than it.
SoC
poor
MediaTek MT6735
30%
Better than 31% of the Phones, 28% are better than it.
Processor Cores Count
ok
Quad Core
58%
Better than 19% of the Phones, 63% are better than it.
RAM Size
below average
1024 MB
27%
To sum it all, LG K4 Dual K130E has acceptable Performance.
Battery Life

In the following we discuss LG K4 Dual K130E’s Battery Life.

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
Fast Charging Support
good
No
64%
Better than 61% of the Phones, 36% are better than it.
Stand by Time
good
500 h
63%
Better than 30% of the Phones, 68% are better than it.
Talk Time
below average
9 h
31%
Better than 29% of the Phones, 71% are better than it.
Battery Capacity
relatively unpleasant
1940 mAh
28%
To sum it all, LG K4 Dual K130E’s Battery Life is normal.
Ergonomics

In the following we evaluate the Ergonomics of LG K4 Dual K130E.

Better than 69% of the Phones, 31% are better than it.
Thinness
more than average
8.9 mm
68%
Better than 0% of the Phones, 30% are better than it.
Water Resistance
below par
No
33%
Better than 0% of the Phones, 74% are better than it.
Scratch Resistance
relatively horrible
No
7%
From analysing LG K4 Dual K130E’s features, we found that LG K4 Dual K130E’s Ergonomics is normal.
Features

In this section we review LG K4 Dual K130E’s Features.

Better than 0% of the Phones, 52% are better than it.
NFC Support
poor
No
18%
Better than 0% of the Phones, 15% are better than it.
Wireless Charging
a little below average
No
44%
To conclude, LG K4 Dual K130E has above average Features.
Bottom Line

To conclude, we have analyzed LG K4 Dual K130E’s specifications and concluded that with more than average Camera, good Screen Quality, a bit below average Performance, normal Battery Life, normal Ergonomics and more than average Features, LG K4 Dual K130E has good over all performance.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *