Nokia Asha 300 VS Doro PhoneEasy 631

In this head to head comparison we take a look at the Nokia Asha 300 and the Doro PhoneEasy 631 Phones. Should you consider the Nokia Asha 300 or would it be better if you consider the Doro PhoneEasy 631? Lets compare these two Phones by comparing their Performance, Battery Life, Ergonomics, Features, Screen Quality and Camera.

Performance
SoC
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

No
Better than 0% of the Phones, 99% are better than it.
0%

RAM Size
128MB
relatively terrible
Better than 2% of the Phones, 96% are better than it.
2%

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Processor Cores Count
Single Core
somewhat horrible
Better than 0% of the Phones, 91% are better than it.
1%

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Processor Frequency
1GHz
unpleasant
Better than 5% of the Phones, 87% are better than it.
6%

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

The Nokia Asha 300 has a slightly lesser Performance compared to Doro PhoneEasy 631.
Battery Life
Fast Charging Support
No
average
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

No
ok
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Battery Capacity
1110mAh
poor
Better than 10% of the Phones, 90% are better than it.
10%

800mAh
bad
Better than 1% of the Phones, 95% are better than it.
1%

Fast Charging Support
No
ok
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

No
ok
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Stand by Time
597h
pleasant
Better than 76% of the Phones, 24% are better than it.
76%

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Bottom line, the Nokia Asha 300 has a marginally poorer Battery Life compared to Doro PhoneEasy 631.
Ergonomics
Scratch Resistance
No
unpleasant
Better than 0% of the Phones, 74% are better than it.
5%

No
somewhat horrible
Better than 0% of the Phones, 74% are better than it.
5%

Scratch Resistance
No
subpar
Better than 0% of the Phones, 74% are better than it.
5%

No
relatively horrible
Better than 0% of the Phones, 74% are better than it.
5%

Water Resistance
No
somewhat terrible
Better than 0% of the Phones, 30% are better than it.
25%

No
bad
Better than 0% of the Phones, 30% are better than it.
25%

Our conclusion is that the Ergonomics of Nokia Asha 300 is similar in comparison with that of Doro PhoneEasy 631.
Features
Wireless Charging
No
relatively below par
Better than 0% of the Phones, 15% are better than it.
34%

No
relatively below par
Better than 0% of the Phones, 15% are better than it.
34%

NFC Support
No
bad
Better than 0% of the Phones, 52% are better than it.
14%

No
poor
Better than 0% of the Phones, 52% are better than it.
14%

The Nokia Asha 300 has a comparable Features compared to Doro PhoneEasy 631.
Screen Quality
Pixel Density
167PPI
bad
Better than 4% of the Phones, 94% are better than it.
4%

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Display Type
LCD
normal
Better than 21% of the Phones, 9% are better than it.
57%

LCD
ok
Better than 21% of the Phones, 9% are better than it.
57%

Screen Resolution
240x320pixels
normal
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

240x320pixels
normal
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Bottom line, the Nokia Asha 300 has a poorer Screen Quality in comparison with Doro PhoneEasy 631.
Camera
Video Max Resolution
640×480 (VGA)pixels
poor
Better than 7% of the Phones, 93% are better than it.
7%

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Cameras Count
1?
somewhat horrible
Better than 0% of the Phones, 84% are better than it.
2%

1?
poor
Better than 0% of the Phones, 84% are better than it.
2%

The When it comes to Camera, Nokia Asha 300 is worse in comarison with Doro PhoneEasy 631.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *