Philips 24PFS5231 Review

In the following article we talk about Philips 24PFS5231 TV features and specifications. We will help you decide whether you should shortlist the Philips 24PFS5231 for purchase or not. To that end we analyze its Connectivity, Efficiency, Picture Quality and Ergonomics.

There are some other related TVs that you should see like Samsung UE50MU6120, Panasonic Viera TX-43D302B, Toshiba 32L3753DB, Sony Bravia KDL-40RD453, JVC LT-42C550 and LG 32LK6100PLB.

Connectivity

In this section we evaluate the Connectivity of Philips 24PFS5231.

Better than 0% of the TVs, 74% are better than it.
USB Ports
bad
1
7%
Better than 0% of the TVs, 88% are better than it.
Smart TV
relatively terrible
No
2%
Better than 0% of the TVs, 79% are better than it.
WiFi Support
somewhat horrible
No
5%
Better than 0% of the TVs, 90% are better than it.
Ethernet Support
poor
No
1%
From analysing Philips 24PFS5231’s features, we found that Philips 24PFS5231’s Connectivity is poor.
Efficiency

In this section we explore Philips 24PFS5231’s Efficiency.

Better than 9% of the TVs, 45% are better than it.
Efficiency Classification
unpleasant
A
28%
Better than 93% of the TVs, 7% are better than it.
Power Consumption
exceptional
34 kWh/year
93%
To sum it all, Philips 24PFS5231 has pleasant Efficiency.
Picture Quality

In the following we evaluate Philips 24PFS5231’s Picture Quality.

Better than 12% of the TVs, 74% are better than it.
Brightness
bad
250 cd/m²
17%
Better than 0% of the TVs, 46% are better than it.
HDR Support
poor
No
22%
Better than 0% of the TVs, 66% are better than it.
Refresh Frequency
unpleasant
50 Hz
10%
Better than 21% of the TVs, 9% are better than it.
Display Type
more than average
LCD
65%
Better than 14% of the TVs, 47% are better than it.
Resolution
poor
1920×1080 (Full HD)
33%
Better than 0% of the TVs, 61% are better than it.
LED Placing
bad
Edge lit LED
13%
Over all, Philips 24PFS5231 has good Picture Quality.
Ergonomics

In the following we take a look at the Ergonomics of Philips 24PFS5231.

Better than 97% of the TVs, 3% are better than it.
Lightness
outstanding
4.4 kg
96%
Better than 33% of the TVs, 67% are better than it.
Thinness
relatively below average
129 mm
33%
Better than 1% of the TVs, 97% are better than it.
Screen Size
somewhat horrible
60 cm
1%
To sum it all, Philips 24PFS5231’s Ergonomics is somewhat below average.
To Conclude

To sum it all, we have reviewed the features and specifications of the Philips 24PFS5231 and found that with below average Connectivity, good Efficiency, good Picture Quality and a bit below average Ergonomics, Philips 24PFS5231 has good over all quality.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *