Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F Review

In the following review we review Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F specfications and features. This review will help you decide whether you should consider the Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F for purchase or not. To that end we review its Battery Life, Ergonomics, Features, Camera, Performance and Screen Quality.

Make sure you reading about other related Phones including Doro Secure 580, Doro PhoneEasy 410gsm, Microsoft Lumia 640, Microsoft Lumia 540, Doro PhoneEasy 515 and Samsung Chat 335 GT-S3350.

Battery Life

In this section we analyze Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F’s Battery Life.

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
Fast Charging Support
good
No
64%
Better than 47% of the Phones, 50% are better than it.
Battery Capacity
ok
2600 mAh
49%
Better than 81% of the Phones, 16% are better than it.
Talk Time
pleasant
22 h
83%
The bottom line is that Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F has above average Battery Life.
Ergonomics

In the following we take a look at the Ergonomics of Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F.

Better than 87% of the Phones, 13% are better than it.
Thinness
lovely
7.9 mm
87%
Better than 0% of the Phones, 74% are better than it.
Scratch Resistance
unpleasant
No
7%
Better than 0% of the Phones, 30% are better than it.
Water Resistance
relatively poor
No
33%
To conclude, Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F’s Ergonomics is more than average.
Features

In the following we examine the Features of Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F.

Better than 48% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
NFC Support
really brilliant
Supports NFC
89%
Better than 0% of the Phones, 15% are better than it.
Wireless Charging
a bit below average
No
44%
To sum it all, Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F’s Features is quite fabulous.
Camera

In this section we explore Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F’s Camera.

Better than 29% of the Phones, 71% are better than it.
Video Max Resolution
below average
1280×720 (HD 720) pixels
28%
Better than 16% of the Phones, 14% are better than it.
Cameras Count
normal
2
56%
The bottom line is that Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F has beyond average Camera.
Performance

In the following we take a look at Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F’s Performance.

Better than 31% of the Phones, 28% are better than it.
Processor Cores Count
average
Quad Core
58%
Better than 1% of the Phones, 96% are better than it.
SoC
unpleasant
Spreadtrum SC8830
1%
Better than 37% of the Phones, 60% are better than it.
RAM Size
relatively below par
1536 MB
38%
Better than 52% of the Phones, 40% are better than it.
Processor Frequency
ok
1.5 GHz
58%
To sum it all, Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F has a little below average Performance.
Screen Quality

In this section we take a look at Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F’s Screen Quality.

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
Screen Resolution
above average
720×1280 pixels
64%
Better than 91% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
Display Type
exceptional
OLED (AMOLED)
99%
Better than 34% of the Phones, 56% are better than it.
Pixel Density
acceptable
294 PPI
40%
To conclude, Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F has good Screen Quality.
Conclusion

To conclude, we have reviewed Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F’s specifications and found that with good Battery Life, good Ergonomics, pretty magnificent Features, good Camera, acceptable Performance and good Screen Quality, Samsung Galaxy J3 SM-J320F has above average bottom line score.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *