Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime SM-G610F VS Huawei P Smart

The following head to head article makes a comparison between the Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime SM-G610F and the Huawei P Smart PhonesShould you consider the Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime SM-G610F or would it be better if you choose the Huawei P Smart? Lets compare their Camera, Features, Performance, Screen Quality, Ergonomics and Battery Life.

Camera
Video Max Resolution
1920×1080 (HD 1080)pixels
more than average
Better than 69% of the Phones, 31% are better than it.
69%

1920×1080 (HD 1080)pixels
above average
Better than 69% of the Phones, 31% are better than it.
69%

Cameras Count
2?
ok
Better than 16% of the Phones, 14% are better than it.
48%

2?
normal
Better than 16% of the Phones, 14% are better than it.
48%

Bottom line, the Camera of Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime SM-G610F is comparable compared to that of Huawei P Smart.
Features
NFC Support
No
relatively terrible
Better than 0% of the Phones, 52% are better than it.
14%

Supports NFC
fabulous
Better than 48% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
85%

Wireless Charging
No
relatively unpleasant
Better than 0% of the Phones, 15% are better than it.
34%

No
relatively below average
Better than 0% of the Phones, 15% are better than it.
34%

The Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime SM-G610F has a inferior Features compared to Huawei P Smart.
Performance
Processor Frequency
1.6GHz
normal
Better than 60% of the Phones, 40% are better than it.
59%

2.36GHz
fabulous
Better than 87% of the Phones, 13% are better than it.
86%

RAM Size
3072MB
beyond average
Better than 60% of the Phones, 22% are better than it.
73%

3072MB
more than average
Better than 60% of the Phones, 22% are better than it.
73%

Processor Cores Count
Octa Core
immensely wonderful
Better than 74% of the Phones, 1% are better than it.
95%

Octa Core
quite fabulous
Better than 74% of the Phones, 1% are better than it.
95%

SoC
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa (7870)
pleasant
Better than 78% of the Phones, 19% are better than it.
80%

Huawei HiSilicon Kirin 659
normal
Better than 58% of the Phones, 39% are better than it.
60%

The When we look at the Performance, Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime SM-G610F is similar when compared with Huawei P Smart.
Screen Quality
Display Type
LCD
ok
Better than 21% of the Phones, 9% are better than it.
57%

LCD
normal
Better than 21% of the Phones, 9% are better than it.
57%

Screen Resolution
1080x1920pixels
average
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

1080x2160pixels
normal
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Pixel Density
401PPI
good
Better than 56% of the Phones, 36% are better than it.
61%

427PPI
good
Better than 77% of the Phones, 23% are better than it.
76%

Our conclusion is that the Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime SM-G610F has a similar Screen Quality in comparison with Huawei P Smart.
Ergonomics
Scratch Resistance
Yes
beyond average
Better than 26% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
68%

Yes
beyond average
Better than 26% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
68%

Water Resistance
No
relatively horrible
Better than 0% of the Phones, 30% are better than it.
25%

No
poor
Better than 0% of the Phones, 30% are better than it.
25%

Thinness
8mm
pleasant
Better than 82% of the Phones, 16% are better than it.
83%

7.45mm
immensely magnificent
Better than 93% of the Phones, 7% are better than it.
93%

The Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime SM-G610F has a comparable Ergonomics in comparison with Huawei P Smart.
Battery Life
Fast Charging Support
No
ok
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Yes
average
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Battery Capacity
3300mAh
pleasant
Better than 78% of the Phones, 19% are better than it.
80%

3000mAh
beyond average
Better than 58% of the Phones, 28% are better than it.
68%

Talk Time
21h
good
Better than 76% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
79%

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

To sum it up, the Battery Life of Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime SM-G610F is comparable in comparison with that of Huawei P Smart.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *