Samsung QE65Q7C VS Samsung QE55Q9FN

This head to head article puts head to head the Samsung QE65Q7C and the Samsung QE55Q9FN TVsShould you opt for the Samsung QE65Q7C or should you go for the Samsung QE55Q9FN? Lets compare their Picture Quality, Efficiency, Ergonomics and Connectivity.

Picture Quality
Display Type
LCD
ok
Better than 21% of the TVs, 9% are better than it.
57%

LCD
normal
Better than 21% of the TVs, 9% are better than it.
57%

Display Type
LCD
ok
Better than 21% of the TVs, 9% are better than it.
57%

LCD
average
Better than 21% of the TVs, 9% are better than it.
57%

Brightness
1500cd/m²
top end
Better than 96% of the TVs, 1% are better than it.
98%

2000cd/m²
best in class
Better than 99% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
99%

Resolution
3840×2160 (4K Ultra HD)
fabulous
Better than 53% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
87%

3840×2160 (4K Ultra HD)
lovely
Better than 53% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
87%

Display Type
LCD
ok
Better than 21% of the TVs, 9% are better than it.
57%

LCD
average
Better than 21% of the TVs, 9% are better than it.
57%

LED Placing
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

Back Light
good
Better than 39% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
79%

The In terms of Picture Quality, Samsung QE65Q7C is comparable when compared with Samsung QE55Q9FN.
Efficiency
Power Consumption
212kWh/year
poor
Better than 7% of the TVs, 92% are better than it.
7%

215kWh/year
subpar
Better than 6% of the TVs, 93% are better than it.
6%

Power Consumption
212kWh/year
subpar
Better than 7% of the TVs, 92% are better than it.
7%

215kWh/year
somewhat horrible
Better than 6% of the TVs, 93% are better than it.
6%

Bottom line, the In terms of Efficiency, Samsung QE65Q7C is slightly superior in comarison with Samsung QE55Q9FN.
Ergonomics
Screen Size
163cm
wonderful
Better than 81% of the TVs, 14% are better than it.
85%

138cm
good
Better than 60% of the TVs, 33% are better than it.
65%

Lightness
28kg
good
Better than 70% of the TVs, 30% are better than it.
70%

23.2kg
good
Better than 73% of the TVs, 27% are better than it.
73%

Thinness
376.9mm
bad
Better than 1% of the TVs, 99% are better than it.
1%

284mm
unpleasant
Better than 9% of the TVs, 91% are better than it.
9%

Bottom line, the Samsung QE65Q7C has a similar Ergonomics in comparison with Samsung QE55Q9FN.
Connectivity
Ethernet Support
Supported
ok
Better than 10% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
47%

Supported
normal
Better than 10% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
47%

WiFi Support
Yes
more than average
Better than 21% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
62%

Yes
good
Better than 21% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
62%

USB Ports
3?
best in class
Better than 64% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
93%

3?
pretty awesome
Better than 64% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
93%

Smart TV
Yes
ok
Better than 12% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
50%

Yes
normal
Better than 12% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
50%

Bottom line, the Connectivity of Samsung QE65Q7C is comparable in comparison with that of Samsung QE55Q9FN.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *