Samsung UE32M5620 VS Hisense H50N6800

The following head to head comparison makes a comparison between the Samsung UE32M5620 and the Hisense H50N6800 TVsTo this end we review the features and specifications of the two TVs.

Picture Quality
HDR Support
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

Yes
wonderful
Better than 54% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
88%

Resolution
1920×1080 (Full HD)
relatively unpleasant
Better than 14% of the TVs, 47% are better than it.
28%

3840×2160 (4K Ultra HD)
wonderful
Better than 53% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
87%

LED Placing
Edge lit LED
bad
Better than 0% of the TVs, 61% are better than it.
10%

Edge lit LED
poor
Better than 0% of the TVs, 61% are better than it.
10%

Resolution
1920×1080 (Full HD)
relatively unpleasant
Better than 14% of the TVs, 47% are better than it.
28%

3840×2160 (4K Ultra HD)
remarkable
Better than 53% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
87%

HDR Support
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

Yes
remarkable
Better than 54% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
88%

Bottom line, the Samsung UE32M5620 has a slightly lesser Picture Quality in comparison with Hisense H50N6800.
Ergonomics
Lightness
6.2kg
really brilliant
Better than 94% of the TVs, 6% are better than it.
94%

17.4kg
good
Better than 78% of the TVs, 22% are better than it.
78%

Screen Size
80cm
unpleasant
Better than 5% of the TVs, 85% are better than it.
6%

Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

Our comparison shows that the In terms of Ergonomics, Samsung UE32M5620 is poorer when compared with Hisense H50N6800.
Connectivity
USB Ports
2?
a bit below average
Better than 26% of the TVs, 36% are better than it.
45%

3?
superb
Better than 64% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
93%

Smart TV
Yes
average
Better than 12% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
50%

Yes
average
Better than 12% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
50%

Ethernet Support
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

Supported
ok
Better than 10% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
47%

WiFi Support
Yes
good
Better than 21% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
62%

Yes
good
Better than 21% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
62%

Bottom line, the Samsung UE32M5620 has a marginally poorer Connectivity in comparison with Hisense H50N6800.
Efficiency
Power Consumption
60kWh/year
good
Better than 73% of the TVs, 25% are better than it.
74%

161kWh/year
bad
Better than 18% of the TVs, 81% are better than it.
18%

Power Consumption
60kWh/year
more than average
Better than 73% of the TVs, 25% are better than it.
74%

161kWh/year
poor
Better than 18% of the TVs, 81% are better than it.
18%

Our conclusion is that the Samsung UE32M5620 has a much superior Efficiency compared to Hisense H50N6800.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *