Sharp Aquos LC-32LE351K VS Sharp Aquos LC-39LE351K

The following head to head article compares between the Sharp Aquos LC-32LE351K and the Sharp Aquos LC-39LE351K TVsTo this end we analyze the specifications of the Sharp Aquos LC-32LE351K and Sharp Aquos LC-39LE351K.

Connectivity
Ethernet Support
Supported
normal
Better than 10% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
47%

Supported
normal
Better than 10% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
47%

WiFi Support
Yes
more than average
Better than 21% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
62%

Yes
good
Better than 21% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
62%

Smart TV
Yes
average
Better than 12% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
50%

Yes
ok
Better than 12% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
50%

USB Ports
2?
a bit below average
Better than 26% of the TVs, 36% are better than it.
45%

1?
poor
Better than 0% of the TVs, 74% are better than it.
5%

Our conclusion is that the Sharp Aquos LC-32LE351K has a marginally superior Connectivity compared to Sharp Aquos LC-39LE351K.
Efficiency
Power Consumption
60kWh/year
beyond average
Better than 73% of the TVs, 25% are better than it.
74%

59kWh/year
good
Better than 75% of the TVs, 25% are better than it.
74%

Power Consumption
60kWh/year
beyond average
Better than 73% of the TVs, 25% are better than it.
74%

59kWh/year
above average
Better than 75% of the TVs, 25% are better than it.
74%

Our review shows that the When it comes to Efficiency, Sharp Aquos LC-32LE351K is comparable when compared with Sharp Aquos LC-39LE351K.
Picture Quality
LED Placing
Edge lit LED
somewhat terrible
Better than 0% of the TVs, 61% are better than it.
10%

Back Light
good
Better than 39% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
79%

Resolution
1920×1080 (Full HD)
unpleasant
Better than 14% of the TVs, 47% are better than it.
28%

1920×1080 (Full HD)
poor
Better than 14% of the TVs, 47% are better than it.
28%

HDR Support
No
poor
Better than 0% of the TVs, 46% are better than it.
17%

No
poor
Better than 0% of the TVs, 46% are better than it.
17%

Display Type
LCD
ok
Better than 21% of the TVs, 9% are better than it.
57%

LCD
average
Better than 21% of the TVs, 9% are better than it.
57%

Refresh Frequency
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

50Hz
relatively terrible
Better than 0% of the TVs, 66% are better than it.
8%

Brightness
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

300cd/m²
acceptable
Better than 31% of the TVs, 48% are better than it.
41%

Our conclusion is that the In terms of Picture Quality, Sharp Aquos LC-32LE351K is similar compared to Sharp Aquos LC-39LE351K.
Ergonomics
Lightness
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

14.2kg
pleasant
Better than 82% of the TVs, 18% are better than it.
81%

Screen Size
80cm
poor
Better than 5% of the TVs, 85% are better than it.
6%

99cm
unpleasant
Better than 19% of the TVs, 81% are better than it.
19%

Thinness
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

231mm
poor
Better than 18% of the TVs, 82% are better than it.
17%

To sum it up, the Ergonomics of Sharp Aquos LC-32LE351K is superior compared to that of Sharp Aquos LC-39LE351K.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *