Sharp Aquos LC-43CFG635K VS Hisense H49N5700

In this head to head comparison two similarly priced TVs are put head to head, the Sharp Aquos LC-43CFG635K and the Hisense H49N5700. Should you consider the Sharp Aquos LC-43CFG635K or would it be better if you buy the Hisense H49N5700? Lets compare the two TVs by comparing their Efficiency, Connectivity, Ergonomics and Picture Quality.

Efficiency
Power Consumption
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

126kWh/year
unpleasant
Better than 32% of the TVs, 67% are better than it.
32%

Power Consumption
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

126kWh/year
relatively below average
Better than 32% of the TVs, 67% are better than it.
32%

Our conclusion is that the Efficiency of Sharp Aquos LC-43CFG635K is superior in comparison with that of Hisense H49N5700.
Connectivity
Smart TV
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

Yes
ok
Better than 12% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
50%

Smart TV
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

Yes
average
Better than 12% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
50%

The Sharp Aquos LC-43CFG635K has a comparable Connectivity in comparison with Hisense H49N5700.
Ergonomics
Lightness
7.9kg
excellent
Better than 93% of the TVs, 7% are better than it.
93%

13.5kg
good
Better than 83% of the TVs, 16% are better than it.
83%

Screen Size
109cm
poor
Better than 38% of the TVs, 61% are better than it.
38%

Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

To sum it up, the Sharp Aquos LC-43CFG635K has a marginally inferior Ergonomics in comparison with Hisense H49N5700.
Picture Quality
Resolution
1920×1080 (Full HD)
relatively below average
Better than 14% of the TVs, 47% are better than it.
28%

3840×2160 (4K Ultra HD)
fabulous
Better than 53% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
87%

LED Placing
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

Back Light
good
Better than 39% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
79%

Refresh Frequency
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

60Hz
acceptable
Better than 34% of the TVs, 50% are better than it.
42%

Resolution
1920×1080 (Full HD)
poor
Better than 14% of the TVs, 47% are better than it.
28%

3840×2160 (4K Ultra HD)
awesome
Better than 53% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
87%

HDR Support
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

Yes
lovely
Better than 54% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
88%

LED Placing
Better than 30% of the TVs, 20% are better than it.
58%

Back Light
pleasant
Better than 39% of the TVs, 0% are better than it.
79%

To sum it up, the Picture Quality of Sharp Aquos LC-43CFG635K is slightly inferior compared to that of Hisense H49N5700.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *