Sigma 18-35/1.8 DC Art VS Canon EF 100/2.8 L IS USM

The following head to head review puts head to head the Sigma 18-35/1.8 DC Art and the Canon EF 100/2.8 L IS USM DSLR CamerasWe analyze the specifications of the two DSLR Cameras.

Video
Our analysis shows that the Video of Sigma 18-35/1.8 DC Art is comparable in comparison with that of Canon EF 100/2.8 L IS USM.
Portability
Lightness
810g
relatively horrible
Better than 10% of the DSLR Cameras, 90% are better than it.
10%

625g
poor
Better than 17% of the DSLR Cameras, 83% are better than it.
16%

Our analysis shows that the In terms of Portability, Sigma 18-35/1.8 DC Art is marginally worse when compared with Canon EF 100/2.8 L IS USM.
Image Quality
Sensor Format
APS-C (crop)
unpleasant
Better than 16% of the DSLR Cameras, 56% are better than it.
26%

Full-frame (35mm)
pleasant
Better than 44% of the DSLR Cameras, 2% are better than it.
81%

Sensor Format
APS-C (crop)
below average
Better than 16% of the DSLR Cameras, 56% are better than it.
26%

Full-frame (35mm)
pleasant
Better than 44% of the DSLR Cameras, 2% are better than it.
81%

Sensor Format
APS-C (crop)
relatively below par
Better than 16% of the DSLR Cameras, 56% are better than it.
26%

Full-frame (35mm)
good
Better than 44% of the DSLR Cameras, 2% are better than it.
81%

Our conclusion is that the Image Quality of Sigma 18-35/1.8 DC Art is marginally poorer compared to that of Canon EF 100/2.8 L IS USM.
Build Quality
Weather Proof
No
unpleasant
Better than 0% of the DSLR Cameras, 31% are better than it.
25%

Yes
pretty magnificent
Better than 69% of the DSLR Cameras, 0% are better than it.
94%

Bottom line, the Build Quality of Sigma 18-35/1.8 DC Art is marginally poorer in comparison with that of Canon EF 100/2.8 L IS USM.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *