Telme C140 VS Samsung Galaxy SM-G950F

In this head to head comparison two competing Phones are compared, the Telme C140 and the Samsung Galaxy SM-G950F. Should you opt for the Telme C140 or should you choose the Samsung Galaxy SM-G950F? Lets compare their Features, Performance, Ergonomics, Camera, Screen Quality and Battery Life.

Features
NFC Support
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Supports NFC
wonderful
Better than 48% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
85%

Wireless Charging
No
poor
Better than 0% of the Phones, 15% are better than it.
34%

Yes
quite magnificent
Better than 85% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
98%

The When it comes to Features, Telme C140 is marginally lesser in comarison with Samsung Galaxy SM-G950F.
Performance
SoC
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Samsung Exynos 9 Octa (8895)
top notch
Better than 89% of the Phones, 7% are better than it.
92%

Processor Cores Count
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Octa Core
really impressive
Better than 74% of the Phones, 1% are better than it.
95%

Processor Cores Count
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Octa Core
top end
Better than 74% of the Phones, 1% are better than it.
95%

RAM Size
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

4096MB
immensely impressive
Better than 79% of the Phones, 8% are better than it.
90%

The When we look at the Performance, Telme C140 is slightly worse in comparison to Samsung Galaxy SM-G950F.
Ergonomics
Scratch Resistance
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Yes
above average
Better than 26% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
68%

Thinness
10mm
ok
Better than 58% of the Phones, 41% are better than it.
58%

8mm
good
Better than 82% of the Phones, 16% are better than it.
83%

Water Resistance
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Yes
outstanding
Better than 70% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
95%

Bottom line, the Ergonomics of Telme C140 is worse compared to that of Samsung Galaxy SM-G950F.
Camera
Our conclusion is that the Telme C140 has a better Camera in comparison with Samsung Galaxy SM-G950F.
Screen Quality
Pixel Density
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

570PPI
superb
Better than 97% of the Phones, 2% are better than it.
97%

Screen Resolution
128x32pixels
normal
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

1440x2960pixels
normal
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Pixel Density
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

570PPI
top end
Better than 97% of the Phones, 2% are better than it.
97%

Our conclusion is that the Telme C140 has a marginally lesser Screen Quality compared to Samsung Galaxy SM-G950F.
Battery Life
Battery Capacity
650mAh
somewhat terrible
Better than 1% of the Phones, 99% are better than it.
1%

3000mAh
beyond average
Better than 58% of the Phones, 28% are better than it.
68%

Fast Charging Support
No
normal
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Yes
normal
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

To sum it up, the When it comes to Battery Life, Telme C140 is inferior compared with Samsung Galaxy SM-G950F.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *