Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite VS Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 SM-A520F

In this head to head comparison two similarly priced Phones are compared, the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite and the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 SM-A520F. To this end we compare the specfications and features of the two Phones, comparing their Battery Life, Features, Screen Quality, Performance, Ergonomics and Camera.

Battery Life
Fast Charging Support
No
average
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Yes
normal
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Talk Time
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

16h
normal
Better than 58% of the Phones, 39% are better than it.
60%

Battery Capacity
4000mAh
superb
Better than 89% of the Phones, 7% are better than it.
92%

3000mAh
beyond average
Better than 58% of the Phones, 28% are better than it.
68%

The Battery Life of Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite is slightly better in comparison with that of Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 SM-A520F.
Features
NFC Support
No
somewhat horrible
Better than 0% of the Phones, 52% are better than it.
14%

Supports NFC
immensely solid
Better than 48% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
85%

Wireless Charging
No
relatively unpleasant
Better than 0% of the Phones, 15% are better than it.
34%

No
unpleasant
Better than 0% of the Phones, 15% are better than it.
34%

The In terms of Features, Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite is lesser when compared with Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 SM-A520F.
Screen Quality
Pixel Density
432PPI
good
Better than 78% of the Phones, 21% are better than it.
78%

424PPI
above average
Better than 70% of the Phones, 24% are better than it.
74%

Display Type
LCD
ok
Better than 21% of the Phones, 9% are better than it.
57%

OLED (AMOLED)
excellent
Better than 91% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
99%

Screen Resolution
1080x2280pixels
normal
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

1080x1920pixels
average
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

To sum it up, the Screen Quality of Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite is comparable in comparison with that of Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 SM-A520F.
Performance
SoC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
good
Better than 68% of the Phones, 26% are better than it.
72%

Samsung Exynos 7 Octa (7880)
pleasant
Better than 81% of the Phones, 18% are better than it.
81%

RAM Size
3072MB
beyond average
Better than 60% of the Phones, 22% are better than it.
73%

3072MB
more than average
Better than 60% of the Phones, 22% are better than it.
73%

Processor Frequency
2GHz
good
Better than 71% of the Phones, 24% are better than it.
75%

1.9GHz
good
Better than 71% of the Phones, 29% are better than it.
71%

Processor Cores Count
Octa Core
really awesome
Better than 74% of the Phones, 1% are better than it.
95%

Octa Core
outstanding
Better than 74% of the Phones, 1% are better than it.
95%

Bottom line, the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has a similar Performance in comparison with Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 SM-A520F.
Ergonomics
Scratch Resistance
No
relatively terrible
Better than 0% of the Phones, 74% are better than it.
5%

Yes
good
Better than 26% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
68%

Thinness
8.8mm
beyond average
Better than 71% of the Phones, 29% are better than it.
71%

7.9mm
fabulous
Better than 87% of the Phones, 13% are better than it.
86%

Scratch Resistance
No
somewhat horrible
Better than 0% of the Phones, 74% are better than it.
5%

Yes
more than average
Better than 26% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
68%

Our review shows that the In terms of Ergonomics, Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite is undoubtedly inferior when compared with Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 SM-A520F.
Camera
Video Max Resolution
1920×1080 (HD 1080)pixels
above average
Better than 69% of the Phones, 31% are better than it.
69%

1920×1080 (HD 1080)pixels
above average
Better than 69% of the Phones, 31% are better than it.
69%

Cameras Count
3?
spectacular
Better than 86% of the Phones, 1% are better than it.
98%

2?
average
Better than 16% of the Phones, 14% are better than it.
48%

The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has a similar Camera compared to Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 SM-A520F.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *