Xiaomi Redmi 4X VS Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 SM-A320F

The following head to head comparison puts head to head the Xiaomi Redmi 4X and the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 SM-A320F PhonesShould you choose the Xiaomi Redmi 4X or should you consider the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 SM-A320F? Lets compare these two Phones in terms of Ergonomics, Camera, Battery Life, Performance, Screen Quality and Features.

Ergonomics
Water Resistance
No
relatively terrible
Better than 0% of the Phones, 30% are better than it.
25%

Yes
spectacular
Better than 70% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
95%

Scratch Resistance
Yes
good
Better than 26% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
68%

Yes
good
Better than 26% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
68%

Thinness
8.7mm
above average
Better than 72% of the Phones, 28% are better than it.
72%

7.9mm
lovely
Better than 87% of the Phones, 13% are better than it.
86%

The Xiaomi Redmi 4X has a slightly lesser Ergonomics compared to Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 SM-A320F.
Camera
Cameras Count
2?
average
Better than 16% of the Phones, 14% are better than it.
48%

2?
average
Better than 16% of the Phones, 14% are better than it.
48%

Video Max Resolution
1920×1080 (HD 1080)pixels
good
Better than 69% of the Phones, 31% are better than it.
69%

1920×1080 (HD 1080)pixels
good
Better than 69% of the Phones, 31% are better than it.
69%

Bottom line, the Camera of Xiaomi Redmi 4X is similar compared to that of Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 SM-A320F.
Battery Life
Stand by Time
432h
ok
Better than 49% of the Phones, 50% are better than it.
49%

Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Talk Time
36h
superb
Better than 97% of the Phones, 2% are better than it.
97%

17h
good
Better than 61% of the Phones, 34% are better than it.
64%

Fast Charging Support
No
ok
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

No
normal
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Talk Time
36h
really wonderful
Better than 97% of the Phones, 2% are better than it.
97%

17h
good
Better than 61% of the Phones, 34% are better than it.
64%

The In terms of Battery Life, Xiaomi Redmi 4X is better compared to Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 SM-A320F.
Performance
Processor Cores Count
Octa Core
really impressive
Better than 74% of the Phones, 1% are better than it.
95%

Octa Core
really awesome
Better than 74% of the Phones, 1% are better than it.
95%

SoC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
good
Better than 61% of the Phones, 38% are better than it.
61%

Samsung Exynos 7 Octa (7870)
pleasant
Better than 78% of the Phones, 19% are better than it.
80%

Processor Frequency
1.4GHz
normal
Better than 48% of the Phones, 52% are better than it.
47%

1.6GHz
average
Better than 60% of the Phones, 40% are better than it.
59%

RAM Size
3072MB
good
Better than 60% of the Phones, 22% are better than it.
73%

2048MB
ok
Better than 40% of the Phones, 40% are better than it.
52%

Bottom line, the Xiaomi Redmi 4X has a comparable Performance in comparison with Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 SM-A320F.
Screen Quality
Display Type
LCD
ok
Better than 21% of the Phones, 9% are better than it.
57%

OLED (AMOLED)
top end
Better than 91% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
99%

Screen Resolution
720x1280pixels
ok
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

720x1280pixels
ok
Better than 30% of the Phones, 20% are better than it.
58%

Pixel Density
294PPI
slightly below average
Better than 34% of the Phones, 56% are better than it.
39%

312PPI
normal
Better than 46% of the Phones, 53% are better than it.
46%

Our conclusion is that the Screen Quality of Xiaomi Redmi 4X is comparable compared to that of Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 SM-A320F.
Features
Wireless Charging
No
relatively below average
Better than 0% of the Phones, 15% are better than it.
34%

No
below par
Better than 0% of the Phones, 15% are better than it.
34%

NFC Support
No
relatively terrible
Better than 0% of the Phones, 52% are better than it.
14%

Supports NFC
awesome
Better than 48% of the Phones, 0% are better than it.
85%

Our analysis shows that the Features of Xiaomi Redmi 4X is poorer compared to that of Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 SM-A320F.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *